Today’s depressing realization: The Terminator came out almost thrity years ago. When it hit in 1984, I was a vital 17 years old, but now I’m a decrepit 45, bordering on 46. And it ain’t getting any better from here; it’s not like that trend will reverse itself.

But enough whining about my advancing age. Although I really liked Terminator when I saw it in my youth, I must say that I haven’t watched it many times since then.

Blame that on the release of 1991’s sequel, Terminator 2: Judgment Day. The top-grossing film for that year, T2 set a new standard for action flicks.

When a new laserdisc release of Terminator appeared not long after the theatrical run of T2, I eagerly grabbed it. I remembered that I liked the first film, and my enjoyment of T2 seemed to indicate that I’d still care for it.

Unfortunately, T2 spoiled me for the older, cruder film. After the more high-tech and visceral thrills of the sequel, the original seemed a bit staid and cheesy. To be sure, I still liked the movie, but I found it to be less exciting and compelling than I remembered and expected.

Some might argue that I favor T2 mainly because of its bigger budget, and they’d largely be correct. However, I’m not taking a simple “bigger is better” stance. In many cases, lower-budget movies are superior to more extravagant affairs because they force the filmmakers to become more creative and resourceful. Crews for big money flicks don’t have to rely on such tactics, so the results can be bloated and flat.

However, I don’t feel that’s the case with the films of James Cameron. He’s worked with some huge budgets, but he hasn’t succumbed to any of the usual temptations. More so than probably any other filmmaker today, Cameron puts the money on the screen; I think his movies are clearly better for their extra expenditures.

To a certain degree, the biggest difference between Terminator and T2 comes down to production values. T2 offers a much better realized world that communicates its elements with greater clarity and realism. For Terminator, Cameron and crew did wonderfully considering their budgetary restrictions, but the cheapness of the film remains evident. That isn’t the case with T2, which had a ton of money behind it.

I also think that Cameron clearly was a stronger, more confident filmmaker by the time of T2. Between those Terminator films, he made two excellent flicks: 1986’s Aliens and 1989’s The Abyss. Aliens represented a quantum leap over Terminator, as it offered a smoother and more compelling vision. The Abyss wasn’t better than Aliens - heck, I don’t think any movie’s better than Aliens - but it created a solid flick nonetheless.

While I doubt Cameron could have gone on to such heights without his experiences on Terminator, I think that many of his subsequent films top it and it looks a bit dated today. Terminator remains an entertaining and seminal work, but it doesn’t match up with Cameron’s later films.

Terminator deals with time travel at its start, as two future warriors return to 1984. One - a cyborg called a Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) - has been sent to kill the mother of a man who will become a rebel leader. That woman - Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) - hasn’t had her son or even met his father yet, so the machine leaders hope to nip that prospect in the bud; no Sarah, no John, no rebellion, or at least that’s what the future computers hope.

To protect Sarah, the human resistance sends Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn). Throughout the early parts of the film, both Kyle and the Terminator track Sarah, and once the cyborg makes her, the chase is on. Essentially the rest of the film follows Sarah and Kyle as they run from the Terminator and try to find a way to get rid of him, something that’s no easy task with the circa 1984 state of weaponry.

When I first saw previews for The Terminator, I thought it’d be a cheesy genre flick that’d come and go quickly. I was quite surprised to see the high regard with which both critics and audiences regarded it. While Terminator shared the poor finances and mercenary tone of low-budget junk, it offered a much more engaging and innovative experience than anyone could have expected.

And it still does, though I still feel that it seems somewhat bland compared to later Cameron offerings. Without a doubt, Terminator was a much more original and seminal program than was T2; in many ways, one could argue the latter simply remade the older movie. While I don’t think that Terminator is a museum piece, I will argue that it comes across somewhat poorly in comparison with its successors.

At 108 minutes, Terminator is the second shortest movie made by Cameron; only 1981’s awful 94-minute Piranha II: The Spawning fills less screentime. The length differences aren’t minor. The theatrical cuts of both Aliens and T2 ran almost 30 minutes longer than Terminator, while both the original release of The Abyss and 1994’s True Lies ran stayed in the same neighborhood. They entered the 140-minute-plus realm, but they weren’t much longer than the other two. Cameron’s last two movies - 1997’s Titanic and 2009’s Avatar were his two longest, at 193 minutes and 162 minutes, respectively. (And a ”Collector’s Edition” cut of Avatar bumped it up to 178 minutes!)

Some feel that the shorter length means that Terminator offers a tighter experience than the later, longer flicks, with a particular emphasis on the differences between it and its sequel. I disagree, mainly because I think T2 is a richer, better-realized work. Despite the increase in length, I don’t find any padding in T2, while Terminator includes a few segments that feel unnecessary.

Except for Piranha, Terminator easily comes across as the most dated of Cameron’s films. No other work of his seems quite as heavily anchored in its era; those mid-Eighties fashions haven’t aged well. Sure, some aspects of T2 are a bit dated – especially a few effects – but it remains a heck of a lot more timeless than its predecessor.

Objectively, The Terminator really is a pretty good movie. It certainly was an influential work that helped create a whole new genre. However, despite its originality, the film has been surpassed by later examples from the field. Almost 30 years after its original release, The Terminator remains a fairly solid action flick, but it’s not one that I think stands among the best in its realm.

The Terminator appears in an aspect ratio of approximately 1.85:1 on this Blu-ray Disc. On the surface, this was the best the film has ever looked, but it didn’t seem to accurately represent the source.

The change occurred in terms of the film’s color timing. For this transfer, the movie has taken on a distinct teal overtone. While not overwhelming, this tint pervaded the image and altered the original.

Everything else about the transfer satisfied. Sharpness was usually strong. Due to photographic conditions, detail could lapse a bit during darker interiors, but I thought most of the movie offered very good delineation. Moiré effects and jagged edges caused no concerns, and I detected no examples of edge enhancement.

Print flaws failed to mar the presentation, and blacks were usually deep and dense. Shadow detail generally looked clean and neatly visible. When murkiness occurred, it stemmed from the source.

What one thinks of the image will depend on how one feels about the new color timing. If the dominance of the teal doesn’t bother you, you’ll love it. If you dislike the new color choice, you’ll be less satisfied. I didn’t hate the tint, but I wasn’t wild about it, so that’s why an otherwise strong presentation got a “B-“ grade from me.

As for the DTS-HD MA 5.1 audio, it also altered the original movie. The mix came from the original monaural track, which unfortunately didn’t also appear on the Blu-ray. The soundfield really opened up the track as it offered a broad and engaging spectrum.

At times I felt the audio seemed to be somewhat “speaker-specific”, as stems popped up rather strictly in one channel or another. Sounds also didn’t blend together in an especially seamless manner; elements tended to mildly jump from one area to another when they panned.

Nonetheless, these criticisms seem a little nitpicky given the origins of the material. For a track compiled from a mono mix, Terminator offered a terrific soundfield. All five channels provided a rather active experience, and they added a solid sense of environment. The score showed good stereo separation in the front, and the effects often came from all around me. The Future War sequences seemed to be especially effective, as they showed good split-surround usage and some fine breadth.

Audio quality betrayed the film’s age at times, but I didn’t think it put a tremendously negative spin on the action. Dialogue usually sounded reasonably clear and natural, though speech appeared somewhat thin and reedy at times and some louder lines displayed moderate edginess. Intelligibility was never a concern, however.

A little distortion accompanied a few effects, but they usually seemed to be clear and accurate, and they offered some positive depth. (Some effects were redone for the remix, so don’t expect all those elements to come from the 1984 source.) The score appeared nicely vibrant and bright, and it demonstrated good dynamics. Ultimately, The Terminator was a good reinvention of the original soundtrack.

How does this 2013 release compare to the original Blu-ray? The audio remained identical, but the visuals changed. The 2013 disc was cleaner and tighter but it came with the aforementioned alterations in color. Even though I’m not wild about the new teal tint, I’d still probably prefer to watch the 2012 disc because it offered so many improvements.

The 2013 Blu-ray offers the same extras as the prior BD. The Terminator: A Retrospective offers interviews with writer/director James Cameron and actor Arnold Schwarzenegger. All of these clips come from older sessions. There are clips of both men together and separately that were shot in 1992, and we also find clips of Cameron with Don Shay from sessions contemporary with Aliens sessions in 1986; these will look familiar to owners of that DVD.

The absence of more contemporary comments in the “Retrospective” seems unfortunate, but the 20-minute and 30-second program offers a fair amount of good information nonetheless. The Shay sessions have the benefit of their era; since they took place only two years after the release of Terminator, there wasn’t much time for attitudes to change or memories to falter. That said, the bits with Schwarzenegger and Cameron together were the most interesting, since we got to see them play off of each other. Overall, the “Retrospective” adds a nice look at the film, though not an extensive one.

In the 12-minute and 57-second Creating The Terminator: Visual Effects and Music, we hear from Cameron, Fantasy II VFX supervisor Gene Warren, visual effects pyrotechnician Joe Viskocil, producer Gale Ann Hurd and composer Brad Fiedel. The show looks at some visual effects elements as well as the movie’s score.

The 2001 Terminator DVD included an hour-long documentary. I don’t have access to that disc any more, but I’d not be surprised to learn that “Creating” simply offers an excerpt from that piece. Why does the Blu-ray not provide the entire “Other Voices” documentary? I don’t know, but its absent disappoints. On its own, however, “Creating” is enjoyable, as it gives us good info about effects and music.

Next we get a collection of seven Deleted Scenes. All of these add up to nine minutes and 55 seconds of material. Many of these are very brief cuts, such as a shot of the Terminator as he leaves the scene of his first Sarah Connor murder.

However, a few are more substantial, such as a piece that shows additional character interaction between Sarah and Reese. These are interesting segments, though I agree that most of them deserved to be cut; I would have kept a short snippet in which Paul Winfield’s character departs the movie, but otherwise these bits were unnecessary.

While The Terminator doesn’t match up tremendously well with director James Cameron’s later films, it remains an influential, seminal and enjoyable movie. What it lacks in polish it makes up for in heart and energy to a degree. I admit I prefer its sequel, but The Terminator still has a lot going for it.

As for the Blu-ray, it objectively looks/sounds very good but it comes with compromises. The image comes with a new teal overlay and the audio only includes the 5.1 remix; we don’t get the original mono track, which I believe has remained MIA on Blu-ray. Extras remain good, though we’re still missing some components from the 2001 DVD. This 2013 Blu-ray is probably the best Terminator on the market, but like all other versions, it has some issues.

To rate this film visit the Special Edition review of THE TERMINATOR