Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (April 18, 2022)
One of Stephen King’s earlier books, 1978’s The Stand remains his longest – by 14 pages. The Stand spans 1152 pages, while 1986’s It clocks in at 1138 pages.
Sort of. As published in 1978, The Stand “only” ran 823 pages, but that happened because editors got King to trim the book by a substantial amount. 1990’s “Complete and Uncut” version reinstated that deleted material and took the book to its record-setting length.
Just as It got adapted into a TV mini-series in 1990, The Stand leapt to the small screen in 1994 – and the latter got a lot more room to breathe. Whereas the 1990 It crammed that massive book into a mere 187 minutes, the 1994 Stand got almost twice as much time to explore the story.
2020 brought a second take on The Stand, one with even more breathing room. This tale spans nearly eight and a half hours, which adds about two and a half hours to the 1994 version of the tale.
And a timely story it remains, as I write this during the COVID-19 pandemic. In The Stand, a government lab in California houses a powerful strain of the flu, and it accidentally gets released.
The virus spreads rapidly. This “super flu” leaves the vast majority of the human population dead.
The survivors eventually wind up in two camps. Mother Abagail Freemantle (Whoopi Goldberg) heads one, and this group stands for positivity. Randall Flagg (Alexander Skarsgård) leads the other, and they seem bent on destruction. The two will face off to determine the future path of humanity.
Given the length of the mini-series, obviously this synopsis leaves out a whole lot of content, especially related to the characters. Stand involves a slew of participants, and a formal exploration of these would make my overview run far too long.
Whereas both the novel and the 1994 version presented events in essentially chronological order, the 2020 Stand decides to go a different route. This means events hop around in time willy-nilly, a choice that seems likely to cause confusion, especially among viewers unfamiliar with the source.
Of course, a non-linear presentation can work great for some projects. The Stand isn’t one of them.
Or at least this rendition of The Stand isn’t one of them. Perhaps a different team of filmmakers could’ve altered the original timeline in a manner that succeeds, but as seen here, the non-chronological narrative seems pointless and distracting.
Maybe someone else can figure out a good reason to alter the original linear progression, but I can’t. The altered timeline just feels like an attempt to spice up the material for its own sake, not because this plot path makes real sense.
Eventually Stand does hit a more chronological path. Unfortunately, it seems probable that the viewer will check out before this happens.
Stand doesn’t really improve when it follows a standard route anyway. Again, some of that stems from our general disinterest in the prior chapters, but also Stand simply fails to develop much of interest despite the apocalyptic tale on display.
Not everything about this Stand flops, but most of it struggles to create interest. This version boasts profanity, violence and nudity that the prior version couldn’t do on network TV, but those don’t make the 2020 edition more impactful. Even without the limitations of broadcast television, the 2020 doesn’t seem any darker or deeper.
We do find a smattering of effective scenes, such as Flagg’s takedown of Bobby Terry. Unfortunately, these pop up too infrequently to make the end product work.
As a tease for fans, the 2020 Stand comes with a new King-penned epilogue. It actually damages the end product, as it seems slow and tedious, with one lame stab at a scare involved.
I never thought I’d look back fondly at the 1994 Stand, but it works better than the 2020 version. Not that this means I now view the prior edition as a good production, as it comes with plenty of problems.
Nonetheless, the 1994 Stand feels less flawed than the 2020 edition. A big incoherent mess, it goes nowhere.