While the Biblical epic is a well-known genre today, this wasn’t true in the early Fifties. For a look at an early effort in that area, we examine 1951’s Quo Vadis.

The flick takes us to Rome circa 64 AD during the reign of nutbag Emperor Nero (Peter Ustinov). Led by Marcus Vinicius (Robert Taylor), the 14th legion returns to Rome after a long campaign but finds their path altered by an imperial order.

The Emperor asks Vinicius and his soldiers to wait for the arrival of another army before they re-enter Rome. During this sojourn, Vinicius stays at the estate of General Plautius (Felix Aylmer), and he makes the acquaintance of the General’s semi-adopted daughter Lygia (Deborah Kerr). Vinicius tries to woo Lygia, but she initially resists his charms, largely due to religious differences, as Lygia is a Christian.

Vinicius doesn’t readily accept defeat, though, so he plots to obtain Lygia – by any means necessary. Though Plautius views Lygia as his daughter, she’s really a hostage and under the control of the state. Vinicius gets Nero to bring her to the palace so he can attempt to force himself on her. This he does, as he takes formal custody of her whether she likes it or not.

This doesn’t last. Christians smuggle Lygia out of town, so Vinicius chases after her. Eventually he learns about Christianity, and Lygia slowly tries to bring him over to her cause. We follow their relationship, related complications, and the destruction of Rome.

I suppose Quo Vadis deserves credit as a pioneering effort in the Biblical epic domain, and it does wear its grand ambitions on its sleeve. As the disc’s case touts, it boasts “110 speaking parts, 30,000 participants and a filmed-on-location panoply of marching legions, and magisterial spectacle”. Indeed it does, as the movie usually offers excellent production values; though some scenes feature obvious soundstages, much of the flick looks great.

Unfortunately, the epic scope of the production proves to be its sole true asset. Or almost its only positive element, as at least one of the actors rises above the material. Ustinov excelled at the portrayal of fatuous gasbags, and in Nero, he found his match. The Emperor was one of history’s all-time great fatuous gasbags, so Ustinov connects well with the part. He gives the role the appropriate level of dithering madness and brings the movie to life whenever he appears.

Too bad the rest of Vadis tends to amble and bore. I expect a certain level of vivacity from an epic of this sort, but the flick almost completely lacks any sense of energy. I wouldn’t mind so much that the film comes without the great drama of better-known epics like Ben-Hur, but I need something more compelling than this. Vadis provides such a long-winded affair that it rarely provokes our interest. Instead, it plods along without much to keep us involved.

I will admit that the flick’s second half manages to provide greater drama. Rome burns, nobles commit suicide, and lions devour Christians. That should be enough to give the movie oomph, and I expect it would – if any of this occurred during its first 90 minutes. By the time something actually happens in Vadis, it feels like too little, too late. The tedium of the film’s first half means that we just don’t care very much when the tale takes a more dramatic turn.

Except for Ustinov, the actors do little to add to the project. I didn’t used to think much of Charlton Heston, but the more I see of bland non-entities like Taylor and Fall of the Roman Empire’s Stephen Boyd, the more I appreciate Heston’s charismatic charms. Put bluntly, Taylor feels totally wrong here. He’s too flat, too stupid and too insipid. As you watch Taylor, you wonder how Vinicius rose above the rank of spear-carrier; he seems like a meathead.

While certainly much more talented than Taylor, Kerr can’t do much with Lygia. Lovely but lifeless, she tends to sleepwalk through the flick. At no point does Kerr threaten to make Lygia an intriguing character; like much of the rest of the film, she just blends into the scenery.

And it’s appealing scenery much of the time, though as I mentioned, those soundstages tend to sabotage the grandness of the flick’s bigger sequences. Unfortunately, Quo Vadis doesn’t have nearly enough to offer to keep us occupied over its nearly three-hour running time. Expect a lot of blather and insufficient drama.

Quo Vadis appears in an aspect ratio of 1.33:1 on this Blu-ray Disc. Though not a bad transfer, the image could use some work.

Some of the problems stemmed from source flaws. Throughout the movie, I detected examples of specks, marks, and other small distractions. These weren’t a consistent nuisance, though, as they seemed most prominent during the film’s first act. I saw some weird jumps as well, such as at the 52:53 mark, when the image of Petronius showed a strange blip.

Sharpness seemed generally positive. Occasional wide shots looked a bit tentative, but the majority of the film showed pretty good accuracy. I noticed no issues with jagged edges or shimmering, but mild edge enhancement appeared at times.

For the most part, colors looked nice. Some shots appeared a bit on the bland side, but the majority displayed positive vivacity. Blacks were reasonably dark and dense, while shadows appeared acceptable. A few shots looked a bit too thick, but the low-light images were usually fine. This was a generally appealing image but not one that stood out as impressive.

I found the Dolby Digital monaural sound of Quo Vadis to seem acceptable for its era but no better. Dialogue tended to be thin and without much fullness. Though the lines remained intelligible, they also suffered from some edginess.

Music also suffered from lackluster definition. Louder passages showed shrill qualities, and the score could be a bit rough, though it usually seemed decent. Similar tendencies affected the effects, which were clear but not particularly lively. The problems didn’t seriously damage the audio, but this remained a mediocre track.

How did the Blu-ray compare to the 2008 DVD? Audio was literally identical, as the absence of a lossless option on the Blu-ray meant no changes in terms of sound. The image showed improvements over the DVD, however; even with the mix of flaws, the Blu-ray was still an obvious step up over the mediocre DVD.

The DVD’s extras repeat here, and we we start with an audio commentary from film historian FX Feeney. He offers a running, screen-specific look at cast and crew, the film's development, story and the adaptation of the source material, themes, historical elements, and basic production notes.

Feeney starts out well but loses steam before too long. Granted, I can't fault him too much for that, given the movie's length, it's tough to provide strong content for such an extended period. Still, the film's first half proves much more informative, so expect spotty material during the final 90 minutes.

I do like much of what Feeney tells us. He combines useful production notes with some neat trivia to make this a reasonably informative piece. I especially like the details about John Huston's early involvement, especially since it sounds like his version of Quo Vadis would've been more effective. Sure, the commentary fades as it goes, but it's still worth a listen.

In addition to the film’s teaser and theatrical trailers, we get a documentary called In the Beginning: Quo Vadis and the Genesis of the Biblical Epic. In this 43-minute and 54-second show, we hear from Feeney, University College London’s Dr. Maria Wyke, Gladiator writer/producer David Franzoni, USC School of Cinematic Arts’ Dr. Drew Casper and Dr. Richard B. Jewell, Royal College of Art rector Sir Christopher Frayling, AFI’s Patricia King Hanson, film critic/historian Richard Schickel, matte artist’s son Harrison Ellenshaw, film historian Rudy Behlmer, and Epic Films author Gary Smith.

The show looks at the source material and early adaptations, the development of the 1951 Quo Vadis and related snarls, cast and performances, the director’s impact on the project, sets and locations, the film’s grand scale and various effects, the score, the flick’s release and reception, and its legacy.

Overall, “Beginning” provides a good look at Quo Vadis. We find some inevitable repetition after the commentary, but there’s actually not a ton of redundant material. I especially like the glimpses of the silent versions of the flick, and we get a lot of nice perspective from this informative piece.

1951’s Quo Vadis may have done much to launch the Biblical epic as a film genre, but that doesn’t make it good. Despite some strong production values and a solid supporting turn from Peter Ustinov, too much of movie shoots itself in the foot with bland performances and a slow story. The Blu-ray offers erratic but generally good picture along with average audio and a couple of informative bonus components. I feel the Blu-ray is fairly satisfying but the movie’s a snoozer.

To rate this film, visit the 2008 review of QUO VADIS