Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (October 11, 2022)
Though 2009’s Orphan didn’t become a big hit, it came with a low enough budget that it made a profit. Normally that would ensure a sequel, as horror films churn out additional chapters with little provocation.
However, it took more than a decade for a second tale to arrive. 2022 finally brought Orphan: First Kill, a prequel to the 2009 film.
Note that a discussion of First Kill will inevitably bring spoilers for the first movie. In the unlikely chance this causes you concerns, skip ahead to the technical merits of the Blu-ray!
Set in Estonia circa 2007, 31-year-old Leena Klammer (Isabelle Fuhrman) resides in a psychiatric facility. However, the psychopath orchestrates her escape from this location via violent methods.
Despite her age, Leena resembles a child, and she pretends to be “Esther”, the missing daughter of a wealthy family headed by Tricia (Julia Stiles) and Allen Allbright (Rossif Sutherland). As dark events become to occur, Tricia suspects “Esther” and this leads toward a potential confrontation.
When she shot the first Orphan, Fuhrman was a 10-year-old playing a 33-year-old playing a nine-year-old. For Kill, Fuhrman was a 23-year-old playing a 31-year-old playing a nine-year-old.
That sounds ambitious, as it probably would’ve been easier to simply recast Leena/Esther with a child. I guess those involved figured Fuhrman was too much the “face” of the semi-franchise to start from scratch.
To my surprise, Kill avoids CG de-aging techniques to make Fuhrman look like a child. Instead, makeup, doubles and camera tricks allow the film to attempt the illusion of youth.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t work – at all. While Fuhrman indeed looks younger than 23, in no way does she resemble a nine-year-old.
This seems more obvious when you compare images of Fuhrman in the first film to those from Kill, but even without that contrast, she can’t pull off the needed impression of youth. In addition, the tricks the filmmakers use via the doubles become nearly comical and never remotely fool the viewer.
If we can’t buy Leena/Esther as a child, then the entire movie collapses. The plot revolves around Leena’s ability to convince people of her youth, so when it seems so abundantly obvious that the film doesn’t present a nine-year-old, everything else falters.
Not that I suspect Kill would offer an especially engaging horror tale even without these issues. The first movie essentially existed as a “bad seed” movie with a major twist at the end, and Kill fails to find new ways to expand on its mediocrity.
With the 2009 flick, I got the impression the filmmakers felt they didn’t need to create an especially compelling tale because they figured the Big Reveal at the conclusion would do all the heavy lifting. This becomes the case again with Kill, as the sequel delivers another “shocking twist” to maintain audience interest.
Of course, I’ll avoid that particular spoiler, but suffice it to say that the curveball fails to seem especially organic. As occurred with the first film, I get the impression the writers invented the wacky story beat and built a script around it without a lot of concern for logic or much else.
All this inexorably leads toward a confrontation between Leena/Esther and her new family, but this lacks suspense because of the movie’s existence as a prequel. We know Leena/Esther will persevere since we already saw the original film.
Kill’s third act does muster some perverse fun with the Twist I Won’t Reveal, but it doesn’t become enough to sustain the entire film. A prequel never made much sense for this particular property, and Kill doesn’t change my mind about that.