Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (July 12, 2023)
In 1885, English author H. Rider Haggard brought the character of Allan Quatermain to life via his novel King Solomon’s Mines. This tale first leapt to the movie screen in 1919, but a 1950 version offers the most famous adaptation of Haggard’s work.
Set in British East Africa circa 1897, Henry Curtis went missing as he searched for the potentially mythical mines of King Solomon. Henry’s wife Elizabeth (Deborah Kerr) and her brother John Goode (Richard Carlson) hire big game hunter Allan Quatermain (Stewart Granger) to locate him.
Allan views this as a potentially suicidal quest, but disillusioned with life, he hopes that the large fee he obtains can support his young son back home in England. This sends Allan, Elizabeth and others on an adventure packed with peril.
Folks of my generation remember a 1985 adaptation of Mines with Richard Chamberlain as Allan. Audiences viewed it as the Indiana Jones rip-off it was, an ironic fate given the manner in which Quatermain acted as an obvious influence on that franchise.
I never saw the 1985 Mines. Indeed, this 1950 version turned into my first formal experience with the character.
And probably my last, as little about the 1950 Mines made me feel interested to spend more time in the world of Allan Quatermain. A surprisingly dull stab at an adventure, the movie shows its age.
In other words, if anyone expects the glorious thrills of Indiana Jones – or even the 1999 Mummy - one will go home disappointed. Honestly, Mines barely even attempts actual “thrills”, at least in terms of action.
Mines appears content to “dazzle” the viewers with visions of exotic Africa. We find seemingly endless scenes in which we view various animals as well as native tribes.
These components should act as complements to the plot and action, but instead they turn into the main course. Allan, Elizabeth and the rest mostly meander their way through Africa with little to do other than shoot randomly at animals and act scared of natives.
Much of the time, Mines feels more like a travelogue than a narrative tale. It occasionally reminds us of the main mission, but the different elements exist to make Africa look foreboding more than they tell a story.
There simply isn’t much plot to go around, and Mines does little to develop its characters. The main roles come with built-in complexity but the movie largely ignores these facets and leaves the parts as flat and forgettable.
Inevitably, Mines pushes Allan and Elizabeth toward romance. Though this concept fits the genre, it seems bizarre given that Elizabeth seeks her missing husband.
Even if poor Henry turns up dead – no spoilers here! – it feels really odd that Elizabeth appears so open to getting romantic with Allan. Doesn’t she need time to grieve?
Really, it would’ve seemed more logical for Mines to feature Henry as Elizabeth’s father or brother. Then it could develop all the sparks between Elizabeth and Allan it wanted without the Ick Factor.
Not that this would save the movie, as it would remain a surprisingly lifeless “adventure”. Allan just doesn’t come across as much of a hero, partly because the film really does give him so little to do in the overall scheme of things.
This reaches its weird zenith during the climax, as the movie ends with a one-on-one fight between African leaders. Allan just stands there and watches, a scene that symbolizes the entire inert affair.
I do appreciate that Quatermain managed to inspire Indiana Jones, as that character’s films have brought me much joy. However, Mines becomes a tedious dud.