Reviewed by Colin Jacobson (June 15, 2022)
With a worldwide gross of $242 million, 1996’s Eraser didn’t flop. However, the movie came with tons of hype and marked a disappointment given the presence of Arnold Schwarzenegger close to his popular peak.
The film’s less than stellar commercial and critical reception explains why it didn’t get a sequel back then. More than a quarter century later, though, we finally find a continuation of the property via 2022’s reboot Eraser: Reborn.
US Marshal Mason Pollard (Dominic Sherwood) acts as an “eraser”. This means that he stages events that can convince the world high-profile witnesses died and thus allow them to avoid actual death at the hands of their powerful enemies.
Matters take a shift when Mason needs to “erase” Rina Kamura (Jacky Lai), the wife of crime boss Kosta (Clayton Evertson) who decides to testify against her husband. This “erasure” goes awry when learns of a double cross, so the two deal with assassins on their tail and attempt to stay alive.
What you won’t find in Reborn: Schwarzenegger or anyone else involved with the 1996 film. Well, at least no one officially involved with that movie, as apparently Reborn director John Pogue performed some uncredited work on the screenplay.
Given that I always thought the 1996 film seemed pedestrian and uninspired, I can’t call Reborn a disappointment. That said, I also can’t refer to it as an actual good movie.
On the positive side, Reborn feels more “theatrical” than I expected. Though I believe it always existed a product intended for home video, it nonetheless seems less “direct to video” than most of its ilk, as it shows pretty good production values.
However, outside of the basic “eraser” premise – which still seems fairly clever - Reborn lacks anything to stand out from the crowd. It reboots the franchise in a manner that never seems remotely memorable.
Part of the problem stems from the uninspiring performances. While Schwarzenegger didn’t break a sweat in the original, at least he showed his natural charisma, and the cast also boasted actual talented actors like James Caan and James Coburn.
Despite lackluster performances, at least those folks brought credibility to the 1996 flick. No one in Reborn manages to do anything to elevate the flat material, unfortunately.
As our leads, Sherwood and Lai look great. Unfortunately, neither can act, though their deficits diverge.
This means Sherwood delivers a performance so understated that it veers wooden, whereas Lai goes too broad. The two seem to exist in different movies, and they never connect.
None of the supporting actors manage to add to the film, and the story suffers from the absence of a clear villain. With a tale such as this, we need a strong antagonist to make it succeed.
Instead, Reborn keeps this side of the story fairly vague. While a “main baddie” does exist, he becomes such a minor presence that he barely registers.
Honestly, as far as direct to video action flicks go, you could do much worse than Reborn. The film seems fairly professional and it occasionally demonstrates minor signs of life.
We do find some terrible computer animation here, though. To avoid spoilers, I won’t reveal what happens, but the climax uses a CG animal in a violent manner that couldn’t possibly seem less believable if the filmmakers tried.
Otherwise, the movie seems adequate, but given the skillions of entertainment options out there, why settle for general mediocrity? This becomes a semi-competent but largely bland attempt to resurrect a generally forgotten property.